    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
     <channel>
        <title>ACCU  :: The Wall</title>
        <link>https://members.accu.org/index.php/journals/991</link>
        <description>Professionalism in Programming</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:webeditor@accu.org" />
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>


        <h2>Journal Articles</h2>


<div class="xar-mod-head"><span class="xar-mod-title">CVu Journal Vol 12, #2 - Mar 2000 + Letters to the Editor</span></div>

<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0">
    <tbody>
    <tr>
        <td valign="top">
            Browse in :
       </td>
       <td valign="top">

                                            <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/journals/">All</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/journals/c76/">Journals</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/journals/c77/">CVu</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/journals/c127/">122</a>
                    (18)
<br />

                                            <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/journals/">All</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/journals/c184/">Journal Columns</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/journals/c186/">LettersEditor</a>
                    (132)
<br />

                                            <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/journals/c127-186/">Any of these categories</a>

                    -                        <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/journals/c127+186/">All of these categories</a>
<br />
</td>
   </tr>
   </tbody>
</table>




<div class="xar-error">
   <p>
 <strong>Note:</strong> when you create a new publication type,
the articles module will automatically use the templates
<em>user-display-[publicationtype].xt</em>
and <em>user-summary-[publicationtype].xt</em>.
If those templates do not exist when you try to preview or display a new article,
you'll get this warning :-)  Please place your own templates in themes/<em>yourtheme</em>/modules/articles . The templates will get the extension .xt there. </p>
</div>
<div class="xar-norm xar-standard-box-padding">
   <h1><strong>Title:</strong>&nbsp;The Wall</h1>
<p><strong>Author:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
<strong>Date:</strong> 08 March 2000 13:15:36 +00:00 or Wed, 08 March 2000 13:15:36 +00:00</p>
<p><strong>Summary:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Body:</strong>&nbsp;<div class="sect1" lang="en">
<div class="titlepage">
<h2><a name="d0e22" id="d0e22"></a>Comments &amp;
Requests</h2>
</div>
<p>Dear Francis,</p>
<p>Thank you for the first number of the new-style C Vu. One of the
things I disliked about the old format was that the layout often
seemed rather cramped and unattractive, and while I do not want to
appear carping it does seem rather a pity to move to a larger
format and yet retain a cramped layout and a typeface so small it
must be difficult for some people to read. Please could we have
larger type and more white space!</p>
<p>My second request is for the regular inclusion, (perhaps inside
the front or back cover), of a box stating how articles or letters
for publication should be presented and sent to you. Perhaps the
prominent availability of this information might encourage more
first-time contributors to put pen to paper (metaphorically, of
course).</p>
<p>What actually prompted me to write now was your editorial
comment on the lack of good books for people just starting into
programming. I do not want to pursue that problem, but to point out
another area where I feel there is a real need for one or two good
books and none seem to exist. I think there would be a considerable
market (I would buy it, anyway!) for a book which provided an
overview of changes in programming and applications development
methods in the PC environment over the last ten years or so. I am
thinking of more or less everything that has happened since a major
application consisted of a single <tt class="filename">.EXE</tt>
file and a couple of overlays, 1Mb was a lot of memory and 100 Mb a
large hard disc.</p>
<p>I realise that quite a lot of the changes over this period have
to do with the rise of Windows, but I am more interested in things
like DLLs, real and protected mode, aspects of object and component
technology like OLE, COM, Corba and Active-X, and ways of running
applications over the internet - all of which seem to be
characterised by ever-increasing complexity and fragmentation. I am
looking for a book written from a programmer's point of view but
not a book on how to write Active-X components or Java applets,
rather one which explains in general terms how the various
technologies work and how (if) they interact with each other, which
relates the terminology of objects, members and attributes to
programs and data in memory and files on disc, and explains why
current applications and development environments require (if
indeed they do really require) such enormous amounts of memory and
disc space.</p>
<p>Helpful staff at Computer Manuals have been unable to suggest a
book offering such an overview, and I am coming to suspect that one
doesn't exist, but I would like to be proved wrong, and be very
glad if you or any member could suggest a book or books covering
the ground I have described.</p>
<p>Finally, could you perhaps arrange to publish sometime an update
on how currently available C++ compilers are matching up to the
standard, with comments and recommendations where appropriate?</p>
<p>Peter Moffatt <tt class="email">&lt;<a href=
"mailto:peter.moffatt@cali.co.uk">peter.moffatt@cali.co.uk</a>&gt;</tt></p>
<p class="c3"><span class="remark">I hope you like the changes I
have introduced this time. However readers should note that we have
lost about 15% of content. C Vu is widely read by editors of
computing books. I hope that one of them will pick up your request
and commission a book to fill it. Your final request is a very hard
one. There isn't any current compiler that is close to compliance
though some are closer than others. People have different
priorities. For example I would prefer a compiler that got right
everything that it did and did not encourage programmers to write
non-conforming code. Others want a compiler that supports their
programming needs in a specific environment and do not mind that
the result is code that will be very difficult to port. Which would
you prefer, a compiler that supported the whole of the ISO standard
but was buggy and difficult to use or a compiler that was
relatively bug free, supported most but not all the Standard and
was easy to use?</span></p>
</div>
</p>
<p><strong>Notes:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>More fields may be available via dynamicdata ..</em></p>
</div>
</channel>
</rss>
