    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
     <channel>
        <title>ACCU  :: You Write, the Editor Replies</title>
        <link>https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/944</link>
        <description>Professionalism in Programming</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:webeditor@accu.org" />
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>




<div class="xar-mod-head"><span class="xar-mod-title">Letters to the Editor + CVu Journal Vol 11, #6 - Oct 1999</span></div>

<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0">
    <tbody>
    <tr>
        <td valign="top">
            Browse in :
       </td>
       <td valign="top">

                                            <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/">All</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c184/">Journal Columns</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c186/">LettersEditor</a>
<br />

                                            <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/">All</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c76/">Journals</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c77/">CVu</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c129/">116</a>
<br />

                                            <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c186-129/">Any of these categories</a>

                    -                        <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c186+129/">All of these categories</a>
<br />
</td>
   </tr>
   </tbody>
</table>




<div class="xar-error">
   <p>
 <strong>Note:</strong> when you create a new publication type,
the articles module will automatically use the templates
<em>user-display-[publicationtype].xt</em>
and <em>user-summary-[publicationtype].xt</em>.
If those templates do not exist when you try to preview or display a new article,
you'll get this warning :-)  Please place your own templates in themes/<em>yourtheme</em>/modules/articles . The templates will get the extension .xt there. </p>
</div>
<div class="xar-norm xar-standard-box-padding">
   <h1><strong>Title:</strong>&nbsp;You Write, the Editor Replies</h1>
<p><strong>Author:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
<strong>Date:</strong> 06 October 1999 13:15:33 +01:00 or Wed, 06 October 1999 13:15:33 +01:00</p>
<p><strong>Summary:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Body:</strong>&nbsp;<div class="sect1" lang="en">
<div class="titlepage">
<h2><a name="d0e20" id="d0e20"></a></h2>
</div>
<p>Hi Francis,</p>
<p>Since you use Turnpike, you may not have been a victim of the
recent email problems at Demon. Check out the gory details at
<a href="http://www.helpdesk.demon.net/announce/da1999-08-24a.html"
target=
"_top">http://www.helpdesk.demon.net/announce/da1999-08-24a.html</a>
courtesy of Clive Feather and friends. Ten days of hair pulling
followed by a one-minute fix.</p>
<p>This is an interesting enough problem that it might be worth
discussing in C Vu, or maybe you could convene a post-mortem BOF
session at JACC or something. The obvious moral is that &quot;mismatched
unspoken assumptions are bad&quot;, but I think it would be
over-simplistic to stop the analysis there. What sort of
decision-tree do the Demon engineers use to focus in on a problem?
Why did they assume for so long that this was a hardware problem?
What mental processes led up to that &quot;ah-ha!&quot; moment of recognising
the problem? And why didn't they instrument the software for
logging much sooner?</p>
<p>When you think about it, most questions have simple answers. The
trick is asking the right question. Would asking a different
question have produced a solution quicker (e.g., checking creation
dates on the cache files)?</p>
<p>There are more questionable assumptions in this world than we
realise.</p>
<p>Lois Goldthwaite <tt class="email">&lt;<a href=
"mailto:loisg@ospace.demon.co.uk">loisg@ospace.demon.co.uk</a>&gt;</tt></p>
<i><span class="remark">If you have access to the Web I suggest
that you go and read this salutary tale. We all know what
characters are valid in specific contexts, don't we? Getting it
wrong cost tens of thousands of people time and irritation. This
was, of course, compounded by other human
errors.</span></i><i><span class="remark">If you want to swap war
stories and what we should learn from them either in C Vu or at
JACC be my guest.</span></i></div>
</p>
<p><strong>Notes:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>More fields may be available via dynamicdata ..</em></p>
</div>
</channel>
</rss>
