    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
     <channel>
        <title>ACCU  :: Programmer Collectives</title>
        <link>https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/916</link>
        <description>Professionalism in Programming</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:webeditor@accu.org" />
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>




<div class="xar-mod-head"><span class="xar-mod-title">CVu Journal Vol 11, #5 - Aug 1999</span></div>

<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0">
    <tbody>
    <tr>
        <td valign="top">
            Browse in :
       </td>
       <td valign="top">

                                            <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/">All</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c76/">Journals</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c77/">CVu</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c130/">115</a>
<br />
</td>
   </tr>
   </tbody>
</table>




<div class="xar-error">
   <p>
 <strong>Note:</strong> when you create a new publication type,
the articles module will automatically use the templates
<em>user-display-[publicationtype].xt</em>
and <em>user-summary-[publicationtype].xt</em>.
If those templates do not exist when you try to preview or display a new article,
you'll get this warning :-)  Please place your own templates in themes/<em>yourtheme</em>/modules/articles . The templates will get the extension .xt there. </p>
</div>
<div class="xar-norm xar-standard-box-padding">
   <h1><strong>Title:</strong>&nbsp;Programmer Collectives</h1>
<p><strong>Author:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
<strong>Date:</strong> 03 August 1999 13:15:32 +01:00 or Tue, 03 August 1999 13:15:32 +01:00</p>
<p><strong>Summary:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Body:</strong>&nbsp;<div class="section" lang="en">
<div class="titlepage">
<h2><a name="d0e18" id="d0e18"></a></h2>
</div>
<p>&hellip;culled from a recent thread on <tt class=
"literal">accu-general</tt>&hellip;</p>
<div class="variablelist">
<dl>
<dt><span class="term">[Jon Jagger]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>What is the collective noun for programmers? A pride?</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[Francis Moore]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>Shouldn't it be a 'class'? Or is this only for C++
programmers?</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[Kevlin Henney]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>A class of OO programmers might be more general. However, I'm
not sure I want to even think about the consequences of
inheritance. For C++ programmers, that could also be a vector (or
deque, or one of the other containers). 'Cos you know when you get
them together, there will be at least one irritator (sic).</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[Paul Collings]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>How about a 'Patch of...'</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[I. R. Bruntlett]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>A service pack of programmers?</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[Ewan Milne]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>... A hack of programmers?</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[Kevlin Henney]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>Or, more specifically, a service pack of Microsoft programmers
and a hack of open source programmers?</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[Keith Derrick]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>An ASSEMBLY of programmers</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[Jim Barry]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>A pipeline of programmers?</p>
<p>We must stop this thead or we will surely go insane. Stark
raving mad. Wibble.</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[Steve Heller]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>How about a &quot;crash&quot; of programmers, or maybe an &quot;argument&quot; of
programmers?</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[Klitos Kyriacou]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>A 'dump' of programmers?</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[Dave Lorde]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>A pattern of programmers? A library of programmers? Or maybe a
feature of programmers...</p>
</dd>
<dt><span class="term">[Steve Heller]</span></dt>
<dd>
<p>My wife has made some suggestions. I like these the best.</p>
<p>A #include of programmers?</p>
<p>A COMPILATION OF PROGRAMMERS!!!!!</p>
</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p>Now what about one for managers? I'll start with: A plague of
managers (<i><span class="remark">I think this was from
Lois</span></i>)</p>
</div>
</p>
<p><strong>Notes:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>More fields may be available via dynamicdata ..</em></p>
</div>
</channel>
</rss>
