    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
     <channel>
        <title>ACCU  :: Old money, new money...</title>
        <link>https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/2432</link>
        <description>Professionalism in Programming</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:webeditor@accu.org" />
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>




<div class="xar-mod-head"><span class="xar-mod-title">CVu Journal Vol 29, #5 - November 2017</span></div>

<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0">
    <tbody>
    <tr>
        <td valign="top">
            Browse in :
       </td>
       <td valign="top">

                                            <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/">All</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c76/">Journals</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c77/">CVu</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c379/">295</a>
<br />
</td>
   </tr>
   </tbody>
</table>




<div class="xar-error">
   <p>
 <strong>Note:</strong> when you create a new publication type,
the articles module will automatically use the templates
<em>user-display-[publicationtype].xt</em>
and <em>user-summary-[publicationtype].xt</em>.
If those templates do not exist when you try to preview or display a new article,
you'll get this warning :-)  Please place your own templates in themes/<em>yourtheme</em>/modules/articles . The templates will get the extension .xt there. </p>
</div>
<div class="xar-norm xar-standard-box-padding">
   <h1><strong>Title:</strong>&nbsp;Old money, new money...</h1>
<p><strong>Author:</strong>&nbsp;Bob Schmidt</p>
<p>
<strong>Date:</strong> 04 November 2017 16:38:24 +00:00 or Sat, 04 November 2017 16:38:24 +00:00</p>
<p><strong>Summary:</strong>&nbsp;Alison Peck looks at the origins of â€˜two pence worthâ€™.</p>
<p><strong>Body:</strong>&nbsp;<p>I can still hear adults in my local area, in an exasperated tone of voice after finally losing patience with children â€˜butting inâ€™, saying, â€œYou just had to add your tuppâ€™orth, didnâ€™t you?â€ I hadnâ€™t thought about the phrase for a long time â€“ not until we did the first in this (very occasional) series back in 2012 â€“ and it set me thinking. What exactly <em>does </em>it mean?</p>

<p>Basically, it has to do with money. Pre-decimal British money, to be precise. As now, you could get a penny coin and a two-penny coin. (As an aside, the names of the coins then sounded much more interesting than now to my ears â€“ half-a-crown, a sixpence, a thrupenny bitâ€¦ and donâ€™t get me started on guineas!)</p>

<p>Almost instinctively, I equated tuppence (two pennies) to â€˜a small amountâ€™, but one still worth counting. I can (vaguely) remember going to the corner shop to buy tuppence â€“ or sometimes <em>thruppence</em> (three pennies) â€“ worth of sweets with my pocket money, which was a threepenny (pronounced â€˜thrupâ€™nyâ€™) bit. I stress I was <em>very</em> young at the time! &#9786;</p>

<p>But am I right? After a bit of research online, the answer is, <em>probably</em>. Most of the sources indicate that there are very similar phrases in most of the English-speaking world, with variations to account for currency differences. For example, Wikipedia suggests that â€˜My 2Â¢â€™ was first used in print in March 1926 <a href="#[1]">[1]</a> as the title of a newspaper article in the USA.</p>

<p>The current usage is more to do with self-deprecation before joining in a discussion, or immediately before or after offering an opinion. However, this is starting to remove the â€˜but still worth countingâ€™ part of my own understanding, and concentrating on the (potential) low worth.</p>

<p>Explanations for the origins of the phrase fit well with my British upbringing and my personal understanding of its meaning. First, â€˜A penny for your thoughtsâ€™ is another familiar phrase â€“ offering to pay a penny (a token amount) but being given twice as much (tuppence worth) suggests you got more than you were expecting, and maybe more than you wanted in return. <a href="#[2]">[2]</a> Secondly, it seems that the phrase started to be used in the UK in the middle of the 19th Century, and there is a suggested link with the standard cost of sending a letter: tuppence. When I get 5 minutes, I may investigate furtherâ€¦</p>

<p>Oh, and if youâ€™re interested in the English language â€“ its history and evolution, its spelling and its regional variations â€“ I suggest you read some of David Crystalâ€™s excellent books on a fascinating subject. <a href="#[3]">[3]</a></p>

<h2>References</h2>

<p class="bibliomixed"><a id="[1]"></a>[1]	<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_two_cents">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_two_cents</a></p>

<p class="bibliomixed"><a id="[2]"></a>[2]	<a href="https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/put+in+my+tuppence+worth">https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/put+in+my+tuppence+worth</a></p>

<p class="bibliomixed"><a id="[3]"></a>[3]	<a href="http://www.davidcrystal.com/biography">http://www.davidcrystal.com/biography</a></p>
</p>
<p><strong>Notes:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>More fields may be available via dynamicdata ..</em></p>
</div>
</channel>
</rss>
