    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
     <channel>
        <title>ACCU  :: Members' Experiences</title>
        <link>https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/1105</link>
        <description>Professionalism in Programming</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:webeditor@accu.org" />
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>




<div class="xar-mod-head"><span class="xar-mod-title">CVu Journal Vol 13, #2 - Apr 2001</span></div>

<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0">
    <tbody>
    <tr>
        <td valign="top">
            Browse in :
       </td>
       <td valign="top">

                                            <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/">All</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c76/">Journals</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c77/">CVu</a>

                     &gt;                         <a href="https://members.accu.org/index.php/articles/c121/">132</a>
<br />
</td>
   </tr>
   </tbody>
</table>




<div class="xar-error">
   <p>
 <strong>Note:</strong> when you create a new publication type,
the articles module will automatically use the templates
<em>user-display-[publicationtype].xt</em>
and <em>user-summary-[publicationtype].xt</em>.
If those templates do not exist when you try to preview or display a new article,
you'll get this warning :-)  Please place your own templates in themes/<em>yourtheme</em>/modules/articles . The templates will get the extension .xt there. </p>
</div>
<div class="xar-norm xar-standard-box-padding">
   <h1><strong>Title:</strong>&nbsp;Members' Experiences</h1>
<p><strong>Author:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
<strong>Date:</strong> 03 April 2001 13:15:44 +01:00 or Tue, 03 April 2001 13:15:44 +01:00</p>
<p><strong>Summary:</strong>&nbsp;<p>Aren't Microsoft Wonderful?</p>

</p>
<p><strong>Body:</strong>&nbsp;<div class="sect1" lang="en">
<div class="titlepage">
<h2><a name="d0e20" id="d0e20"></a>Part 1</h2>
</div>
<p>I've noticed a slow down in my system over the last few days,
mainly in MSIE, but today it started happening in Windows Explorer
too. &quot;Ah&quot; I thought &quot;time to defrag the hard drive&quot;. Good plan, so
I fire up the Maintenance Wizard, set it going and leave it to
it.</p>
<p>Coming back I find it crashed half way though Scandisk. &quot;That's
odd&quot; I thought, reset and ran scandisk again. Another crash. Repeat
this twice more, I was not impressed. &quot;Fine&quot; I thought, &quot;I'll just
do a defrag&quot;. No such luck, crashed immediately (twice). Now on
Windows systems Scandisk and Defragmenter are crucial to the speedy
running of your computer; so why does such mission critical
software fail so much? (As I write I still haven't managed to get
either working satisfactorily.) Don't even get me started on
graphics drivers...</p>
</div>
<div class="sect1" lang="en">
<div class="titlepage">
<h2><a name="d0e27" id="d0e27"></a>Part 2</h2>
</div>
<p>Installing new software is something we all do regularly, so why
is it so hard? I have MS Office 2000, and the installer seems to
have a constitutional objection to doing its job. I selected &quot;full&quot;
installation - five months later I actually have all of Office on
my machine. Now this may be a lack of understanding on my part, but
I am experienced with computers - if it takes me 5 months to figure
out how to carry out a simple(!) operation how on earth would a new
user cope? MS still have a lot to learn about user friendliness,
but the trouble is will they take the time and effort to learn - or
just blunder on thinking (rightly, unfortunately) they are big
enough not to care much about the small, inexperienced user?</p>
</div>
<div class="sect1" lang="en">
<div class="titlepage">
<h2><a name="d0e32" id="d0e32"></a>Desenting Voice
- Francis Glassborow</h2>
</div>
<p>One of my favourite pastimes is having a go at Microsoft. I
never defrag my drives. I get very annoyed with any system that
even tries to do it for me. However I keep a spare drive that is
large enough to hold a copy of any of my drives. If a drive is
getting messy, I copy all the files over to the spare (I do not
care if it takes all night) clean up the messy drive, then copy
everything back again. This way is slow, but safe. Nothing is
trying to rearrange my software &amp; data on the fly. By the time
you have a quarter gig of RAM caching makes most programs run as
fast as you want.</p>
<p>Now to installation. Microsoft have some irritating habits, but
Joe/Jane Public, who does not want anything special gets along with
their installs. JP hated OS/2 because they never understood what
was happening and shuns Linux because most installations ask techy
questions that leave him/her lost for answers. My hate for MS
installations is their desire to install features that I do not
want on my system. I hate Word turning URLs into active hyperlinks.
I do not want Fast Find anywhere near my drives and a certainly
loath 'Personal Assistant'. But note that these are features that
many non-techy users actually like.</p>
</div>
</p>
<p><strong>Notes:</strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>More fields may be available via dynamicdata ..</em></p>
</div>
</channel>
</rss>
